<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Layer 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcguireslaw.com/2006/06/23/layer-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mcguireslaw.com/2006/06/23/layer-10/</link>
	<description>The value of any product or service increases with its mobility.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Mobility Stories of 2006</title>
		<link>http://mcguireslaw.com/2006/06/23/layer-10/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top Ten Mobility Stories of 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcguireslaw.com/?p=111#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] There was a lot of discussion this year about the 802.20 standards, making it a big story for 2006. Unfortunately, there still aren’t any standards. As I discussed in June, the main reason is politics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There was a lot of discussion this year about the 802.20 standards, making it a big story for 2006. Unfortunately, there still aren’t any standards. As I discussed in June, the main reason is politics. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; #10: Biggest Stories of 2006: 802.20 Standards</title>
		<link>http://mcguireslaw.com/2006/06/23/layer-10/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>The Law of Mobility &#187; Blog Archive &#187; #10: Biggest Stories of 2006: 802.20 Standards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mcguireslaw.com/?p=111#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] There was a lot of discussion this year about the 802.20 standards, making it a big story for 2006.  Unfortunately, there still aren&#8217;t any standards.  As I discussed in June, the main reason is politics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There was a lot of discussion this year about the 802.20 standards, making it a big story for 2006.  Unfortunately, there still aren&#8217;t any standards.  As I discussed in June, the main reason is politics. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

